It’s Time to Legally Outline Bullying — Parliament Should Act Now and Search to Redress this Lack of Definition…
Learn the copy or hearken to the podcast…
Bullying is without doubt one of the most widespread and damaging behaviours in our society. We hear in regards to the torment and the some tragedies in colleges, workplaces, on sports activities groups in golf equipment, on-line—and but, within the eyes of the regulation, “bullying” has no single, clear definition. Irrespective of how small – or massive bullying impacts folks and it’s not simply phrases, it’s actions, or intimidation, and even simply the best way somebody comes throughout that may appear to be an act of bullying.
That should change. Now.
If folks get bullied – they’re entitled to battle again. Stand as much as the bullies.
The poisonous folks will all the time get discovered.
SnookerZone’s Chris Gaynor won’t tolerate being “bullied” “tormented” “ridiculed” or typically taken the mickey out of in anyway by the snooker group.
And no-one else needs to be too in relation to their “customary” or their fashion of snooker or for the rest…
Regardless of many years of rising consciousness, there’s nonetheless no devoted authorized framework within the UK—or certainly in lots of jurisdictions—that defines bullying as a authorized fallacious in itself. As an alternative, victims should attempt to match their experiences right into a patchwork of present legal guidelines: harassment, discrimination, assault, defamation, stalking. This works for some, however leaves numerous others with out readability, safety, or redress.
If Parliament desires to point out real dedication to tackling bullying in all its varieties, it ought to take into account enshrining a single, codified authorized definition of bullying and making a unified framework for coping with it. Bullying is bullying, regardless and it’s not nearly searching for authorized redress, generally, the psychological facet it leaves on somebody, will be traumatic, and, additionally, damaging to somebody’s confidence and skill to imagine of their price.
Let’s be clear, bullying is unaccptable, and any organisation that lets it happen, or doesn’t put an finish to it, needs to be named and shamed publically. As a result of, on the finish of the day, folks shouldn’t need to put up with grief from folks in any setting.
I’ve stated it earlier than right here, however bullies are cowards who’ve their very own insecurities and points, and they should search assist, and remedy. Usually, bullies are individuals who have been bullied themselves or have needed to put up with being performed down all their lives.
The Authorized Hole
At current, bullying within the UK is addressed not directly by legal guidelines akin to:
- The Equality Act 2010, which prohibits bullying associated to intercourse, race, and different traits protected by lawe to protected traits like race, intercourse, or incapacity.
- Legal legal guidelines in opposition to assault, threats, or malicious communications.
- Civil claims for defamation, intentional infliction of hurt, or breach of responsibility in workplaces.
But all these legal guidelines solely apply in restricted contexts—or provided that the bullying connects to particular protected traits, legal violence, or reputational harm.
What in regards to the individual relentlessly humiliated by a colleague who merely dislikes them, with no racial or sexual motive? Or {the teenager} focused on-line for private causes unrelated to any protected attribute?
These victims could endure devastating psychological hurt, but discover there’s no single regulation they’ll level to that merely says: “That is bullying, and it’s fallacious.”
The Penalties of Silence…
This authorized vacuum has real-world penalties:
✅ Confusion for victims and establishments. Employers, colleges, and organisations typically depend on various inside insurance policies, resulting in inconsistent approaches and patchy enforcement.
✅ Lack of accountability. Bullies slip by gaps within the regulation if their conduct doesn’t meet the edge for present offences.
✅ Hidden hurt. Many victims really feel they’ve “no case” and stay silent, fuelling additional hurt and psychological well being points.
✅ Information blind spot. And not using a authorized definition, there’s no coherent nationwide image of bullying’s prevalence or price.
Whereas insurance policies and steerage exist in workplaces and colleges, they carry no statutory power. Victims deserve stronger, unified safety.
Energy for Good — Public Willingness for Change
Public consciousness of bullying’s harm has by no means been greater. Campaigns such because the Anti-Bullying Alliance’s “Energy for Good” 2025 —the main focus of Anti-Bullying Week in November and persevering with into the Alliance’s wider 2025 agenda—remind us that people and establishments alike have the facility to create environments the place bullying will not be tolerated.
“Energy for Good” has inspired colleges, employers, and communities to step up and defend these in danger. However whereas such campaigns are invaluable, they spotlight an uncomfortable reality: the regulation nonetheless lags behind public sentiment.
Voluntary initiatives alone can not resolve an issue of this scale. And not using a authorized spine, even one of the best intentions threat falling quick.
Why We Want a Authorized Definition…
A single, statutory definition of bullying would carry a number of advantages:
- Readability. Victims, employers, colleges, and the general public would all know what behaviour crosses the road.
- Consistency. Organisations may align their insurance policies to the identical authorized customary.
- Deterrence. Clearer legal guidelines would ship a robust sign that bullying is unacceptable in any context.
- Information and coverage. A authorized definition would help higher knowledge assortment, resulting in extra knowledgeable policy-making and focused interventions.
What Ought to the Regulation Say?
Drawing from worldwide fashions (akin to Australia’s Honest Work Act, which defines “office bullying”), a UK statutory definition may look one thing like this:
“Bullying means repeated, unreasonable behaviour directed at a person or group that creates a threat to their well being, security, dignity, or well-being.”
Key questions Parliament would want to contemplate embrace:
- Ought to it cowl single critical incidents, or solely repeated acts? One extreme act can generally be as damaging as a collection of smaller ones.
- Does it require intent, or is the impact on the sufferer sufficient? Many bullies declare they “didn’t imply hurt,” however the affect is what actually issues.
- Ought to it apply throughout all contexts—workplaces, colleges, on-line, public areas?
- How ought to it stability free speech and sturdy debate in opposition to safety from psychological hurt?
Making a authorized framework wouldn’t imply criminalising each disagreeable encounter. It might be structured to:
- Present civil cures, akin to injunctions, compensation, or tribunal claims.
- Set requirements for organisations to research and handle bullying internally.
- Set up reporting mechanisms and steerage for enforcement.
Studying from Bullying Insurance policies Elsewhere
Some jurisdictions have already made progress. Australia’s Honest Work Fee can difficulty “cease bullying” orders in workplaces. Scandinavian nations embrace bullying underneath broader “psychosocial hazards.” Even within the UK, employment tribunals have proven rising willingness to contemplate bullying claims underneath harassment regulation the place attainable.
But piecemeal options stay insufficient. The regulation shouldn’t depart a lot struggling unrecognised just because the behaviour doesn’t neatly match into an present authorized field.
The Time is Now…
We reside in an period of heightened consciousness of psychological well being, office tradition, and the devastating affect of on-line abuse. Campaigns like Energy for Good have confirmed that individuals need motion—and are able to help these going through bullying.
Society more and more recognises that psychological hurt will be simply as actual and lasting as bodily harm. It’s time for the regulation to catch up.
A single, codified authorized definition of bullying would ship a transparent sign: that our society stands with victims, values human dignity, and calls for respect. Parliament has the facility—and the ethical responsibility—to make it occur.
Bullying could also be an age-old downside, however the regulation needn’t stay caught previously. Let’s give this phrase the authorized power it deserves—and switch public goodwill into lasting authorized safety.
That’s what our flesh pressers are paid to do. Make folks’s lives higher, extra habitable, and, to handle the problems, no matter how massive or small.
Write to your MP and ship a sign that bullying in society is fallacious, and desires a correct authorized framework. Possibly then whether it is codified into regulation, will our society be much less keen to interact in vile behaviors that may have an effect on an individual’s psychological well being, and, additionally confidence in society.
